🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils will be slashed by more than half, after a controversial law change that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple elected officials depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Local populations often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums alongside the local body elections, which concluded on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has stated it aims to end “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

The recent municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to create other types of wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.