🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."